Nimblebrain Forums - Not logged in
Forum Help Search Chat Register Login
Previous Next Up Topic Cosmology / Alternative Cosmology / Neutron Repulsion (2273 hits)
By Mike Petersen Date 2011-05-10 10:27 Edited 2011-05-10 11:00
This is definitely alternative cosmology. 

About five years ago, Dr. Oliver Manuel had a paper published entitled On the Cosmic Nuclear Cycle and the Similarity of Nuclei and Stars in which he stated that neutron repulsion is the actual source of energy within stars.

I came across this paper rather obliquely.  See this article at Physorg.com: Scientist says neutron stars, not black holes, at center of galaxies.

For reference, I include some tidbits from another paper, The Sun's Origin:

The fusion of hydrogen atoms – the same mechanism that is at the heart of a Hydrogen Bomb – is generally accepted as the energy source of our Sun. If this were the actual source of the Sun’s energy,

a) Why is the Sun’s emission of neutrinos only about 1/3 the amount expected from fusion reactions ?

b) Why is the ratio of Oxygen atoms to Carbon atoms only 2 at the Sun’s surface, when laboratory and theoretical calculations predict a much higher value ?

c) If fusion powers the Sun, why does it discard 50 trillion tons of Hydrogen each year as "solar wind" trash, with traces of other elements carefully sorted by atomic weight ?

d) How do deep solar magnetic fields sort elements by weight, control Earth's climate, and produce the solar wind, solar flares and gigantic solar eruptions ?


Since I haven't seen anything recent on this, can anyone say with any confidence if this has been shown to be rubbish, or is there something to it?
By Mike Petersen Date 2011-07-19 23:25
Another paper on this subject by Dr. Manuel - this one is recent:

Neutron Repulsion

Isn't someone with a good physics background going to reduce this to rubble? 

- Mike Petersen
Previous Next Up Topic Cosmology / Alternative Cosmology / Neutron Repulsion (2273 hits)

Powered by mwForum 2.15.0 © 1999-2008 Markus Wichitill